A 0 would not necessarily be a troll in that case. Now, when a company knowingly false advertises and/or fucks its customers over like Cyberpunk them it's reasonable to say that all bets are off. Even if you hated the story and were not impressed with the game design, wouldn't a 4 or 5 be at least somewhat reasonable? A 0, 1, or 2 score for that game is a frigging troll. How is that just someone not liking the game? A game as polished and objectively good in terms of design and visuals. He's talking about the extreme "0 out of 10" review scores. If that was the standard actual decent intelligent humans would go by then all games would get bombed. There is a huge difference between review bombing a bug infested unplayable game and review bombing a the GOTY because you are insecure about fictional pixel designs of one character. So for the most part it boils down to objective faults (technical side of games) and subjective things (gameplay, story, characters, design etc.). I can understand extremely bad reviews/scores for games that are technically broken and unplayable to a degree that you have to wait months for patches to just even connect to servers or start a match or advance in the game, but in some cases review bombing is the highest amount of petty we have ever witnessed because crybabies are so insecure in their gaming opinions that they feel the need to give bad scores to games they haven't even played because they think it gives their meaningless lives a voice to bring their ultra polarized opinion to the table and counteract the good scores a game is getting, but in reality it is like a little kid screaming extra loud that something else gets attention.